I'd like to answer that question with one small idea. We have a complete Bible that we carry around with us. It contains all of the oracles, the words, of God. Some of those words in the old half, are difficult to understand. (Truth to tell, some in the new half are too.) Some of God's actions seem odd, or arbitrary, or contrary to what we know about God from His Son. For some of us, it's just easier to skip those old words. Here's a place where the letter to the Hebrews can help.
This letter helps us understand the role of the old covenant. It helps us see the relationship between the covenants. It opens up the old half of the Bible in a new way. Look at how the author deals with the tabernacle in chapter 9. Here are some things we learn about it:
- It was the place for worship under the old covenant
- The daily coming and going (of worship) was not allowed at the mercy seat, the place of God's presence, but only in the outer tent.
- To enter God's presence, the inner tent, the high priest had to be cleansed of all impurity, and so a sacrifice was made for him. And he could enter but once a year.
- No one else could enter the holy place. In other words, individuals never had full relationship with God.
- This tabernacle was just a shadow, a taste of God's true tabernacle.
- Jesus entered the true tabernacle once for all time.
- Just as there was shed blood for the high priest, Jesus entered by virtue of His own shed blood.
- Because He did, we can now enter that holy place, and enjoy full relationship with God.
- God desires relationship.
- Because of His very nature, pure and holy, and our own impure and unclean nature, there is a separation that exists. God lives in the holy of holies, and we can't enter.
- An offered sacrifice allows one individual to be pure long enough to enter on our behalf.
- That's not good enough and so the new covenant, mediated by Christ, and inaugurated by His sacrifice, takes care of our sin for all time, and now we can enter into God's presence (v.4:16).
1 comment:
Here's a curious pair of verses: Heb 9:13-14. In reading these verses I immediately thought of 1 Pet 3:21, that passage about baptism that Clark touched on last Sunday. There seems to be a parallel: the external "outwardly clean" versus the internal "cleansed conscience".
Peter, of course, relates baptism to the "cleansed conscience"; but I've always wondered what he meant by "not the washing of dirt from the body". Obviously no one seriously thought they were getting saved by taking a bath, cleaning dirt off their body! So why did Peter feel the need to say that?
Perhaps this passage in Hebrews helps explain what Peter had in mind when he wrote that verse.
(Note also Heb 10:22 for another version of this theme.)
Post a Comment